¿Publicar o Investigar?
Resumen
La lógica del mercado ha trascendido la esfera económica y ha echado raíces en el ámbito educativo. Al someterse a ella, los investigadores ceden la profundidad, creatividad y reflexividad de sus trabajos a las demandas del sistema productivo. Sus efectos se hacen sentir en el campo de la investigación, materializándose en una cultura académica perversa que privilegia la cantidad de publicaciones sobre la calidad. En el presente artículo se realiza una reflexión filosófica acerca de esta postura ética y se propone, desde la fenomenología, recuperar la actitud teorética para mantener vigentes los fines esenciales de la investigación.Palabras clave:
actitud teorética, objetivación epistémica, revistas predatorias, publicación por vanidadReferencias
Barnett, R. (2016). Constructing the university: Towards a social philosophy of higher education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1183472
Bartholomew, R. E. (2014). Science for sale: The rise of predatory journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 107(10), 384–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076814548526
Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489.
Berger, M. (2017). Everything you ever wanted to know about pretatory publishing but were afraid to ask. ACRL. At the Helm: Leading Transformation.
Cazzanelli, S. (2020). The Genealogy of the Theoretical. Heideggerian Readings of Husserl and Aristotle. Signos Filosóficos, XXII(44), 54–79.
Chitumbo, E., & Chewe, P. (2020). Predatory Publishing: A growing Threat to Scholarly Publishing. Zambia Journal of Library & Information Science, 4(2), 1–10.
Dreyfus, H., & Taylor, C. (2015). Retrieving realism. Harvard University Press.
Edwards, M. A., & Roy, S. (2017). Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0223
Frederick, D. E. (2020). Scholarly communications, predatory publishers and publish or perish culture in the 2020s. Library Hi Tech News, 37(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2020-0007
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice. Power & the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Furnham, A. (2020). Publish or perish: rejection, scientometrics and academic success. Scientometrics, 0123456789, 0–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03694-0
Grudniewicz, A., Moher, D., Cobey, K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., Ardern, C., Balcom, L., Barros, T., Berger, M., Ciro, J. B., Cugusi, L., Donaldson, M. R., Egger, M., Graham, I. D., Hodgkinson, M., Khan, K. M., Mabizela, M., Manca, A., … Lalu, M. M. (2019). Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. En Nature (Vol. 576, Issue 7786, pp. 210–212). Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2017). Tendencias globales en educación superior y su impacto en América Latina: Desafíos pendientes. Lenguas Modernas, 50, 15–32. https://revistas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/49248/51715
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals?. Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150
Nielsen, P., & Davison, R. M. (2020). Predatory journals: A sign of an unhealthy publish or perish game?. Information Systems Journal, 30(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12289
Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718
Revilla, D. (2017). Expectativas y tensiones en la asesoría de tesis en la Facultad de Educación de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 15(1), 277. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2017.6057
Richtig, G., Berger, M., Lange-Asschenfeldt, B., Aberer, W., & Richtig, E. (2018). Problems and challenges of predatory journals. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 32(9), 1441–1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15039
Sandel, M. (2020). The Tyranny of Merit. What’s Become of the Common Good. Penguin Random House.
Search, A. (2017). Research for the public good. In Entrepreneurial Literary Theory: A debate on Research and the Future of Academia. Shot in the Dark.
Search, Alexander, Gupta, S., Akcelrud, F., & McDonough, T. (2017). Entrepreneurial Literary Theory: A Debate on Research and the Future of Academia. Shot in the Dark.
Sullivan, H. (1958). Vanity Press Publishing.
Taylor, C. (1997). Argumentos Filosóficos. Ensayos sobre el conocimiento, el lenguaje y la modernidad. Paidós.
Taylor, C., & Bernstein, R. (2017). Diálogos (D. Gamper (ed.)). Gedisa.
